Jason Murray Kubler vs Hyeon Chung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 18 Apr at 05:24 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

J. Murray Kubler vs H. Chung

Jason Murray Kubler
Jason Murray Kubler

Flag AUS AUS

w
l
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
Hyeon Chung
Hyeon Chung

Flag KOR KOR

l
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

32
Age
29
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
188
C. Rank
371
63
Best Rank
19
0
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.3M
Career Money
$2.5M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Kubler 1 - 0 Chung

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jason Murray Kubler winning 2 and Hyeon Chung winning 0. The last match between Jason Murray Kubler and Hyeon Chung was at the Busan Challenger, 18-04-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Kubler1
Chung0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QFBusan Challenger(04-18-25)

Hard
AUS Flag
Jason Murray Kubler
6
6
KOR Flag
Hyeon Chung
2
4

J. M. Kubler vs H. Chung H2H Profile

Stats
$1,257,590Career Prize Money$2,529,406
67.16% (452-221)Career Total W/L64.29% (288-160)
1Hard0
25Titles17
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss50.00% (1-1)

J. M. Kubler vs H. Chung Match Preview:

When diving into the intricacies of second serve performance over the past six months, the numbers tell an enlightening story. Could it be that the percentage of points won on second serves holds the key to predicting match outcomes? Take Chung and Kubler, for instance. Chung has clinched 39.92% of points on their second serve, while Kubler edges ahead with 46.24%. The significance of these figures is high, as they have been known to closely forecast match results.

Switching gears to return game statistics, we delve into who might have the upper hand in breaking their opponent's serve. Here, Chung has secured 45.15% of their competitor's second serve points recently, with Kubler again narrowly surpassing at 45.37%. However, the first serve return statistics add an interesting twist. Chung thrives by winning 30.17% of their opponent's first serve points, while Kubler lags with 21.38%. This disparity might just tilt the balance of this head-to-head encounter.

How does facing pressure impact these players? Chung has managed to save 45.45% of breakpoints, yet Kubler proves more resilient, saving 56.3%. These statistics could be incredibly useful for in-game betting strategies. Both players have impressive match records over the past year; Chung has triumphed in 75% of their matches, whereas Kubler edges out with a 77.14% success rate. Predicting outcomes often revolves around these holistic views of player performance.

Surface preferences further reveal interesting dimensions. Chung excels on Hard courts, boasting a 70% win rate, but struggles on Grass. Meanwhile, Kubler demonstrates prowess on Clay with a 70% success rate and finds Indoor Hard courts less favorable. Surface compatibility often influences match predictions, potentially affecting player confidence and game strategy.

Evaluating player level illuminates where each player stands in the competitive hierarchy. Over the past year, Chung has showcased their skills predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, achieving a 77.42% win rate. Kubler, competing mainly at the same level, leads with an 83.33% win rate. Comparing their standings against opponent quality reveals Chung facing competitors with an average rank of 259.14, while Kubler's adversaries rank at 227.83 on average. Such insights are crucial to estimate who might be the titular favorite.

In scenarios extending to deciding sets, prediction enthusiasts might be swayed by recent stats. Chung has clinched 44% of these intense final sets, narrowly besting Kubler, who has a 43% success rate in similar situations. Moreover, past performances in current events should never be overlooked, as they often reveal players' momentum and adaptability. Finally, analyzing break point conversion, Chung presents a strength by converting 33.12% of opportunities, slightly outperforming Kubler's 29.31% efficiency.

In light of these in-depth comparisons and critical statistics, Kubler emerges as the potential victor in this matchup. Their marginally stronger second serve performance, ability to save breakpoints, and slightly higher overall match-winning percentage provide a compelling prediction in favor of their triumph.

Jason Murray Kubler vs Hyeon Chung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. M. Kubler vs H. Chung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won6
7Aces (Total)0
3Total Double Faults9
1:38:1Average Match Time1:38:1
51% (26/51)1st Serve %56% (38/68)
85% (22/26)1st Serve Win %63% (24/38)
60% (15/25)2nd Serve Win %37% (11/30)
36% (4/11)Break Pts Won %33% (1/3)
49% (33/68)Return Points Win %27% (14/51)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Kubler 52%, Chung 49%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kubler 52%, Chung 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Kubler 63%, Chung 58%.

J. M. Kubler Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardSydney Challenger - 17-11-2025

SF

AUSJ. Duckworth
L
7-5 6-2

QF

AUSA. Bolt
W
7-5 6-3

R2

CZEM. Gengel
W
6-4 6-2

R1

AUSP. Marinkov
W
6-3 1-6 6-2
HardBrisbane 3 Challenger - 10-11-2025

R1

JPNL. Vithoontien
L
6-3 3-6 6-3

H. Chung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardYokohama Challenger - 17-11-2025

R1

JPNK. Uchida
L
6-3 6-0
I.hardKobe Challenger - 10-11-2025

R2

TPEC. Hsin
L
1-6 6-2 7-5

R1

JPNR. Matsuda
W
6-1 6-4
HardMatsuyama Challenger - 03-11-2025

R1

AUSP. Sekulic
L
6-4 6-3
HardSeoul Challenger - 27-10-2025

R1

HKGC. Lam
L
6-3 6-2
banner

J. M. Kubler vs H. Chung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
67.16% (452/221)YTD Win/Loss64.29% (288/160)
64.01% (1003/564)Sets Win/Loss61.55% (661/413)
55.23% (8134/6594)Games Win/Loss54.73% (5369/4441)
65.34% (164/87)Hard Win/Loss67.15% (233/114)
70.14% (249/106)Clay Win/Loss58.82% (30/21)
37.50% (6/10)Indoor Hard W/L57.50% (23/17)
64.71% (33/18)Grass Win/Loss20.00% (2/8)
0.31Aces Per Game0.26
2227Aces Total1235
0.26Double Faults Per Game0.24
1855Total Double Faults1156
1:10:17Average Match Time1:25:2
517.4Average Opponent Rank537.81
61% (19703/32069)1st Serve %62% (16020/25756)
72% (14097/19703)1st Serve Win %70% (11219/16020)
51% (6267/12365)2nd Serve Win %50% (4914/9736)
44% (1448/3304)Break Points Won % (Total)45% (1300/2914)
40% (12979/32367)Return Points Win %42% (11149/26853)
51.92% (27/25)Slam W/L57.89% (22/16)
38.46% (5/8)Masters W/L51.52% (17/16)
50.00% (1/1)Cups W/L78.57% (11/3)
47.06% (24/27)Main Tour W/L55.66% (59/47)
66.27% (169/86)Challenger W/L65.22% (105/56)
75.33% (226/74)Futures W/L77.08% (74/22)
69% (433/632)Best of 3 Sets Win %64% (257/402)
48% (15/31)Best of 5 Sets Win %68% (28/41)
55% (113/205)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)51% (68/133)
57% (108/189)Deciding Set Win %56% (69/123)
90% (431/390)1st Set Won, Won Match87% (287/249)
9% (431/38)1st Set Won, Lost Match13% (287/38)
25% (242/61)1st Set Lost, Won Match24% (161/39)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Tue, 25 Nov, 09:00 AM
Prediction
BELK. Coppejans1
GBRT. Samuel
W1
1.94
W2
1.75
Mon, 24 Nov, 08:21 PM
Prediction
DOMP. Bertran
PERA. H. D. Pino
W1
2.18
W2
1.59
Tue, 25 Nov, 08:00 AM
Prediction
GBRZ. Stephens
TURG. SaritasALT
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Tue, 25 Nov, 09:00 AM
Prediction
GERN. EhrenschneiderALT
FRAM. Erhard4
W1
2.28
W2
1.54
Tue, 25 Nov, 08:00 AM
Prediction
RUSA. AleshchevALT
SUIG. L. Tanner
W1
5.25
W2
1.116
Tue, 25 Nov, 03:30 AM
Prediction
AUSM. Bouzige
AUSA. Bolt4
W1
7
W2
1.059